The Rise of Teguh Samudera

RMN’s second training ship, the Teguh Samudera (Firm Ocean) was recently launched by Tun Dr Siti Hasmah Mohd Ali, the wife of former Prime Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad at NGV Tech shipyard in Sijangkang, Banting, Selangor on February 27.

This was the second launch for RMN’s latest Samudera class training ships after Gagah Samudera (Mighty Ocean), the lead ship was launched by the Datin Seri Rosmah Mansur, the wife of the current Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak on December 14, 2012. (here)

Both the Gagah Samudera and Teguh Samudera are 75.9 meters long, have a helicopter deck as well as capable of operating up to 2,500 nautical miles non-stop for 21 days. 47 crews are needed to operate the ships. Beside the crews, both ships are able to accomodate 60 trainees on board including a specialised compartment for female whom 12 could be brought along.

The ships are also equipped with combat system, radar, navigational and communication equipment as well as close-in weapons enabling them to conduct limited combat operation beside their primary training role.

Unlike the Gagah Samudera which hull blocks were built by DSME at its facility in South Korea, the Teguh Samudera was wholly built by NGV Tech. The keel laying works were conducted on January 10 and its takes just 56 days after the works to complete and launch the vessel. Teguh Samudera will be officially handed over to the RMN on June 21, 2013.

The RMN Chief of Staff has taken this opportunity to proposed to the Government for conducting a follow up procurement of additional two of such vessel in the future to fulfill the RMN’s requirement for four training vessels.

In conjunction with the launching ceremony, Tun Dr Mahathir, one of Malaysia’s advocate on local maritime industries also took the chance to look at the progress of Gagah Samudera which is currently undergoing fitting works at NGV Tech’s facility.

source Malaysia Flying Herald

Read more »

Airstrikes just first of our firepower options

IT'S amazing what a round of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare can do -- that a cherubic, bespectacled couch potato, who is as athletic as a slab of tofu with zero military background, can form an opinion of how a military campaign should be waged.

Even before the dust cloud from the airstrikes on the Sulu terrorist positions in Kampung Tanduo in Lahad Datu had settled, earth-bound pseudo-"Mavericks" and armchair generals were already taking to the blogs and social media to give their take on how the air and ground offensive should have been carried out.

Some had claimed that the airstrikes by the three Royal Malaysian Air Force Boeing F/A-18D Hornets and five British Aerospace Hawk 208s that were launched off from Labuan had been completely ineffective and had failed to neutralise the enemy.

One even said: "The US air campaigns shows (sic) that effective aerial bombardment requires hundreds if not thousands of ordnance drop (sic) over several days", and suggested that for the airstrikes to work, a sustained bombing campaign along the lines of the Tora Bora throwdown in December, 2001 (five days) and the two-month bombing campaign in Kosovo in 1999, should have been implemented.

There were also those who said that the pilots had completely missed the target, the absence of a body count being the justification for their claims.

An online news portal reported that Abraham Idjirani, the spokesman for the terror group, had said that the bombs dropped by the air force had not hit their positions but had, instead, fallen on security forces that had massed up for the assault.

A late night chat over teh tarik and roti tampal with "Taco", a retired Hornet driver with more than 2,000 hours logged on the type, and his former backseater "Hanus" shed some light on the operational thinking that went into the planning and execution of the air offensive segment of Ops Daulat.

"The first thing you have to realise is, the air force's mission here was not to take out the enemy. They were tasked with softening up the target for the ground troops.

"Because the terrorists are scattered in the area of operations, there's no way the ground commanders can be certain that an airstrike would get every single one of them.

"That's why they opted for a layered offensive. The airstrike was just one element. We still needed to put boots on the ground and clear the area door-to-door, one house at a time."

The aerial bombardment was followed by a mortar barrage and suppressive fire from heavy machine guns before the ground forces were sent in.

When parallels between Tora Bora, Kosovo and Lahad Datu were brought up, "Hanus" put things in perspective.

"Bro, Tora Bora and Kosovo are two completely different scenarios. "Tora Bora is huge, so is Kosovo. It took five days of constant pounding in Tora Bora because of the extensive network of tunnels bored miles into the mountain.

"Even thermobaric bombs and 2,000 pounders couldn't do the job as the tunnels were dug deep inside the mountain.

"Plus, there was no specific intel on the exact location of Osama Bin Laden, and the Taliban numbered in the thousands. Nato took two months to bring Kosovo to its knees because of the huge tasking and targeting folders that needed to be sorted out."

"This (Kampung Tanduo) was a precision strike. Every single target the pilots were given was from three weeks of observation and intelligence-gathering.

"We didn't have to carpet bomb Kampung Tanduo because the Hornets' loadout was (GBU-12 Paveway II) laser guided bombs. These are precision-guided munitions; this was a surgical strike. You 'lase' the target with the (AN/AAS-38 Nitehawk) laser target designator and you can't miss," "Taco" adds.

The idea of carpet bombing, a concept borne on the back of the London blitz of the 1940s by Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur 'Bomber' Harris against German cities and industrial centres, is no longer socially palatable, more so if the area being hit is your own backyard. Politically, it's suicide.

"Carpet bombing is when you want to level an entire town full of enemy combatants. Not a good idea when you're doing it on your own territory and when the risk of collateral damage is high.

"Our guys established a very tight FEBA (forward edge of battle area) because of the proximity of the villages to the target. They took into consideration the lives and property of fellow Malaysians.

"We knew exactly where the terrorists were located from various sources; Humint (human intelligence, from people on the ground), Sigint (signals intelligence) and Comint (intercepted communications, decrypted communique) and other still-classified sources," says Taco.

"This is a limited, low-intensity conflict which requires precision strike capability. The air force's objective for this mission was to soften the targets for the ground forces, nothing more.

"Also, it's not how many bombs you drop, it's how you use them. If the intel is solid and 10 bombs can do the job, why would you want to expend more munitions?"

How do you explain the absence of a body count resulting from the airstrike, then?

"Dude, do you know what a 500lb bomb can do to a human body? If it's an airburst, the lethality radius is expanded. You vapourise. That's it. If that doesn't kill you, the overpressure will.

"The concussion will rip you apart, but not before turning your internal organs to mush. Fusing plays a major part in the kill radius of the bomb."

We should never be led to believe that this crisis will be over in a few days and that one airstrike will get rid of the problem. More work lies ahead for the ground troops and any thoughts that a sustained bombing campaign alone will solve this problem is downright irresponsible and naive.

ON THE OFFENSIVE: The aerial bombardment of Sulu terrorists in Kampung Tanduo merely marks the start of the blitz on our enemies
Read more : New Straits Times

Read more »