Latest Post

MALAYSIA IS A COUNTRY SPLIT INTO TWO HALVES


Malaysia is a country split into two halves: Peninsular Malaysia and East Malaysia - which are separated by a large body of water, much of which is controlled by neighbouring countries. The Royal Malaysian Navy’s (RMN) shape and mission has been largely determined by this factor - along with the circumstance that Malaysia controls one half of the vital Straits of Malacca. This is reflected in the operational command organization of the RMN.

The RMN has three operational area commands overseen by Fleet Command headquartered at RMN Lumut, with an independent Submarine Command reporting directly to the Chief of Navy. The three major operational commands are, firstly: COMNAV I, located at RMN Kuantan. This is responsible for the East Coast of Peninsular Malaysia and the South China Sea portion of it including Malaysia’s 200-mile EEZ claims there, along with the waters along the Singapore Straits. COMNAV II, located at RMN Sepanggar, is responsible for the entire coastline and waters of the East Malaysian states of Sabah and Sarawak plus the various seas surrounding them which form part of Malaysia’s 200 mile EEZ claims. Finally, COMNAV III, located at RMN Langkawi, is responsible for the West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia and the Malacca Straits.
The RMN splits some of its surface ships evenly between the three area commands while others are deployed to areas depending on operational or training requirements. The navy’s two submarines are permanently stationed at RMN Sepanggar in the COMNAV II area of operations with Submarine Command also based at RMN Sepanggar. Submarine Command has not only the responsibility for the operations of both the RMN submarines but also in regard to the training of personnel for them. Following an initial blitz of publicity to offset media reports on maintenance issues in regard to the two Scorpene class boats, the RMN has drawn a tight veil over the operations and exercise participation. The submarines will continue to be a source of controversy in Malaysia - owing to issues surrounding the circumstances of their purchase and a subsequent murder linked to it.
While all three naval commands are of importance, COMNAV II is seen as the major operational challenge. This is because the East Malaysian state of Sabah, whose waters fall under COMNAV II, faces the South China Sea, the Sulu Sea and the Celebes Sea. Additionally, COMNAV II’s portion of the South China Sea includes the disputed Spratly Islands. Malaysia currently maintains 5 military outposts there, the largest being Naval Station Lima on Swallow Reef. Various works undertaken since its initial occupation in 1983 has led to the reef becoming an island about 7.3km long and 2.2km wide. It has a land area of around 6 hectares with a runway capable of supporting C-130 transport aircraft and a dock allowing the RMN’s patrol craft to operate from there. Since 1999 Malaysia has not added any additional outposts in the Spratlys beyond the five established there. The Spratlys and the South China Sea around them are known to the RMN as the “Gugusan Semarang Peninjau” (GSP) operational area, which roughly translates to “Frontier Reconnaissance Island Chain” in English.
Currently the RMN has only one overseas operational mission, namely “Operation Fajar” - an ongoing task to escort merchant shipping belonging to the Malaysian International Shipping Corporation through the pirate-infested waters near the Gulf of Aden. The mission was sparked by the seizure of two MISC vessels in September 2008 by pirates and since then the RMN has been carrying an indefinite anti-piracy escort mission in the region. Initially these escort missions were carried out by ships from the RMN fleet, but the costs along with the wear and tear on them led to the RMN working with MISC to provide an alternate solution in the form of a converted MISC merchantman to function as a naval auxiliary ship.
To perform this mission, the container ship Bunga Mas Lima was converted to a RMN auxiliary ship on 1 June 2009. The modifications to the 699 TEU vessel (owned by MISC) included the installation of a helicopter landing dock, light weapons mounts, military grade communications and medical facilities, the ability to launch RMN’s small craft and a repainting of the ship to RMN’s colours. MISC personnel commissioned as Naval reservists formed the ship’s crew while a combined special forces team drawn from all three services of the Malaysian Armed Forces along with a medical team and an RMN naval helicopter detachment with a single helicopter were also stationed on the ship. The success of this led to the acquisition of a second naval auxiliary, the Bunga Mas 6 being launched in August 2011 to operate simultaneously in the region with the Bunga Mas 5. The roles were one ship escorting westbound shipping while the other will escort eastbound shipping - however budgetary and operational constraints prevented the RMN from having an additional helicopter detachment to operate in the region. Thus the RMN’s sole helicopter in the area was deployed on one or the other ship depending on requirements. Recently though, as a result of the number of piracy attacks declining in the Gulf of Aden, the RMN has scaled back the presence of the auxiliary ships to a single vessel deployment on a rotational basis rather than both ships being simultaneously deployed in the region.
At the time of writing, Malaysia is engaged in a potentially violent standoff with Philippines militants in the East Malaysian state of Sabah, who appeared to have infiltrated the state by sea. As a consequence, it is expected that there will be an effort to beef up the RMN’s riverine and coastal waters capabilities. The RMN currently operates some 17 CB-90 combat boats bought in the late 90s - but there may be plans to bolster this fleet in light of this latest confrontation.
Also ongoing tensions in the South China Sea, particularly involving the disputed Spratly Islands, are expected to add to the RMN’s burden since the Navy is responsible for maintaining Malaysia’s presence in the disputed areas. Given that the area that it has to cover, the RMN’s relatively small fleet size of around 40 ships seems inadequate to meet all its operational tasks. Budget issues and the lack of priority by the Malaysian government over the years has made fleet development difficult.
The cancelled Batch 2 Lekiu class frigates are a good example of this. In 2006 the Malaysian government had signed a letter of intent with BAE Systems for the construction of two follow-on ships to the existing two Lekiu class frigates already in service in the RMN. The Batch 2 ships were to be built locally on the island of Labuan at the Labuan Shipyard and Engineering dockyard. However in August 2009, it was reported that both the Malaysian government and BAE Systems had reached an agreement not to continue with the deal due to cost-cutting measures.
With the cancellation of the Batch 2 Lekius, the RMN is expected to have to settle for a possible upgrade and Service Life Extension Program (SLEP) of the existing two Lekius - though no funding has been allocated publicly for that. Similarly an upgrade and SLEP of the 4 Laksamana class corvettes is also expected to be carried out. Originally built in Italy for the Iraqi Navy as the Assad class but impounded following the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait, two of the ships were purchased by Malaysia in 1995 and the remaining two in 1997.
The Malaysian government has provided funding for one of the Royal Malaysian Navy’s key programs, the six ship Second Generation Patrol Vessel – Littoral Combat Ship (SGPV-LCS). The SGPV-LCS are meant to be the follow-on to the six Kedah class Next Generation Patrol Vessels (NGPV) built by Boustead Naval Shipyard (BNS). The SGPV-LCS will be bigger and more heavily armed compared to the Kedah’s. Despite the LCS name, the SGPV-LCS is a conventional design hull based on DCNS’s Gowind design, with the French shipbuilder being selected as the foreign partner to work with BNS on the SGPV-LCS program.
The ship is to have an overall length of 107m, a full load of 2750 tons, a 106 personnel crew, maximum speed of 28 knots with a cruising speed of 16 knots. The range of the ship is expected to be 5000NM with an endurance of 21 days and will have a hangar and flight dock for a single helicopter. The weapon systems of the SGPV-LCS have been a source of continuing disagreement between the RMN and Malaysian government. The RMN is insisting that the ships be outfitted their exact choice while the government has pressed for systems that are cheaper than what the navy wants. The RMN is said to prefer the Raytheon ESSM for the surface to air missile with the Kongsberg Defence & Aerospace Naval Strike Missile for the surface-to-surface weapon.
However, the government prefers the Mica system for the SGPV-LCS’s SAM and the MBDA’s Exocet as it’s SSM. The main gun is expected to be the BAE Systems Bofors Mk3 57mm, with which BNS’s parent company, Boustead Heavy Industry Corporation has an existing joint venture partnership known as BHIC Bofors Asia. The first ship is scheduled to be delivered in 2017, with subsequent vessels delivered every six months thereafter. All will be built at the BNS facilities in Lumut. Nevertheless, with this ship class only to be delivered beginning from 2017, it is clear that the RMN will face a capability gap till then. There has been moves by the US to offer surplus Perry class frigates being decommissioned from the US Navy to meet the capability gap though little has emerged from this to date. This is partly because any such acceptance would require funding approval from the Malaysian government, which has appeared to have put any defence decision involving money on hold until after the election. Though the design and manufacture of equipment are different from other RMN ships, the Perrys would help the RMN in preparing crews for the SGPV-LCS as their capabilities in air, surface and anti-submarine warfare matches the SGPV-LCS mission profile and capabilities.
The RMN has launched two 79.5m locally manufactured training ships in December 2012 and February this year. These have been built jointly by Malaysian company NGV Tech with assistance from South Korea’s Daewoo Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering under a MYR294 million (US $96.1 million) contract signed in 2011. Both ships, named ‘Gagah Samudera’ and ‘Teguh Samudera’ will be commissioned later this year. Each is armed with a 30mm main gun and will have a helicopter dock but no hangar. They will carry a complement of 45 personnel along with 60 trainees. In his speech at the launch of the ‘ Teguh Samudera’ in Febuary this year, RMN Chief Admiral Tan Sri Aziz Jaafar urged the Malaysian government to consider the purchase of two additional training ships. He recommended this occur during the timeframe of the 11th Malaysia Plan of 2016-2020. He asked for additional ships based on the same design but configured as combat ships as replacements for the current 8 aging Handalan and Perdana class Fast Attack Craft, which entered service in the 1970s.
Meantime, the RMN’s multi-purpose, command and support ship (MPCSS) requirement - which was originally scheduled to be implemented in the time frame of the 8th Malaysia Plan (2001-2005) - has yet to be realized. This is despite the loss to a fire in 2009 of the Royal Malaysian Navy’s sole amphibious operation capable ship, the Newport class LST KD Sri Inderapura. The purchase of the Multi-Purpose Support Ship is now unlikely to commence until the 11th Malaysia Plan of 2016-2020. Various companies - including Navantia and DSME - have been proposing their designs to meet this requirement. Malaysia’s initial requirements have been said to be a three-ship class capable of carrying a combined arms battalion and four medium lift helicopters.
Also likely to take place in the timeframe of the 11th Malaysia Plan of 2016-2020, though the RMN would like to have it commence as soon as possible, is the purchase of at least 6-12 anti-submarine warfare helicopters. These will supplement the RMN Naval Air Wing which current consists of six Augusta Westland Super Lynx and six Eurocopter Fennecs. The US has been heavily promoting the MH-60R Seahawk for this requirement - though there has been talk of a navalized Eurocopter EC-725. This latter choice would ensure some compatibility of logistics and maintenance with the RMAF’s existing EC-725 fleet. The main issues the RMN has in regard to the MH-60R are the manpower requirements for the aircraft’s maintenance and support team and also cost. However, the helicopter does meet all the RMN’s requirements and the issue of cost stems more from the funding available to the Malaysian government for such a purchase than the actual price of the helicopters themselves.
Further into the future is the requirement for new Minehunters to replace the Mahamiru class (Italian Lerici class), which have been in service since 1985 - though a SLEP program was carried out by Thales in the mid-2000s. Again although the RMN have listed the replacement of the minehunters on their requirement list, no funding have been specifically allocated for it.
The Maritime Patrol Aircraft function is carried out by the Royal Malaysian Air Force with four Beechcraft 200T. The navy is happy to continue with this mission carried out by the RMAF, and both services have been jointly pushing for a new long range MPA which will carry a combined RMAF/RMN crew - though the aircraft will be part of the RMAF’s fleet. The US has been marketing the Northrop Grumman E-2D for this requirement - though again both the RMN and RMAF have been stymied for lack of funds.
Ongoing funding issues are likely to remain the greatest challenge facing the RMN. However, given the age of many of its fleet and the emerging capability gaps - particularly in regard to the amphibious capability - it is likely that the Malaysian government will eventually have to make available the funds needed to address RMN requirements.
By Dzirhan Mahadzir at Defence Review Asia
 

TOR for F/A-50 'Golden Eagle' now being crafted

MANILA — The Philippines is now on track to operate again supersonic jet aircraft as the "term of reference" (TOR) for the F/A-50 "Golden Eagle" is now in the works.
KAI F/A-50 Golden Eagle (photo : chosun)

"Procurement for the F/A-50 will be on a government-to-government basis," the Department of National Defense (DND) observer stressed.

He also said the go-ahead signal for the TOR only came last week.

The order came from the Government Procurement Policy Board (GPPB), an attached agency of the Department of Budget and Management.

The DND observer declined to comment on when the TOR will be completed but stressed that it will be done within the year.

But he expressed confidence that the Philippine Air Force (PAF) will be flying the F/A-50 within two years time.

The last supersonic planes operated by the country was the Northrop F-5 "Freedom Fighter" which was decommissioned due to lack of parts and air frame aging sometime in 2005.

The TOR describes the purpose and structure of a project, committee, meeting and negotiation.

It also defines the vision, objectives, scope and deliverables (i.e. what has to be achieved); stakeholders, roles and responsibilities (i.e. who will take part in it); resource, financial and quality plans (i.e. how it will be achieved); work breakdown structure and schedule (i.e. when it will be achieved) and includes success factors/risks and restraints.

The Philippines is in the market for 12 supersonic trainer aircraft which can double as interim fighter and attack planes for the PAF. It has allocated P18 billion for this program.

The GPPB earlier gave the DND the "green-light" to start pre-negotiations with the South Korean government for 12 F/A 50 aircraft last January.

The plane is manufactured by the Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI). The F/A-50 is also known as the TA-50.

The F/A-50 design is largely derived from the F-16 "Fighting Falcon", and they have many similarities: use of a single engine, speed, size, cost, and the range of weapons.

KAI's previous engineering experience in license-producing the KF-16 was a starting point for the development of the F/A-50.

The aircraft can carry two pilots in tandem seating. The high-mounted canopy developed by Hankuk Fiber is applied with stretched acrylic, providing the pilots with good visibility and has been tested to offer the canopy with ballistic protection against four-pound objects impacting at 400 knots.

The altitude limit is 14,600 meters (48,000 feet), and airframe is designed to last 8,000 hours of service.

There are seven internal fuel tanks with capacity of 2,655 liters (701 US gallons), five in the fuselage and two in the wings.

An additional 1,710 liters (452 US gallons) of fuel can be carried in the three external fuel tanks.

Trainer variants have a paint scheme of white and red, and aerobatic variants white, black, and yellow.

The F/A-50 "Golden Eagle" uses a single General Electric F404-102 turbofan engine license-produced by Samsung Techwin, upgraded with a full authority digital engine control system jointly developed by General Electric and KAI.

The engine consists of three-staged fans, seven axial stage arrangement, and an afterburner.

The aircraft has a maximum speed of Mach 1.4-1.5.

Its engine produces a maximum of 78.7 kN (17,700 lbf) of thrust with afterburner. (PNA)

FPV/PFN
by Priam F. Nepomuceno Zambo Times
 

Chinese WZ-10 attack helicopter based on Kamov design

The Changhe Aircraft WZ-10 attack helicopter is based on a Russian design commissioned by the Chinese, Kamov's chief design engineer says.





In 1995, Kamov developed a preliminary design in the 6t weight class under a contract with the Chinese government, says Sergey Mikheev, Kamov's chief design engineer, speaking at the Heli-Expo trade show in Las Vegas, Nevada.

"Due to understandable reasons, this information was kept secret," he says.

The Project 941 design was not based on any Soviet-era attack helicopter project and was strictly designed for China's unique requirements, Mikheev says.

"They gave us the desired weight, we discussed preliminary performance parameters, then we signed a contract and we fulfilled the contract," he says.



After Kamov completed the design, the Russian design bureau verified the design via testing.

Kamov then delivered the design to China and the Project 941 concept was accepted by that country's government for further development, he says. Kamov did not participate in any further developmental work on the WZ-10, he insists.

Thereafter, to the country's credit, Mikheev says, the Chinese handled the rest of the developmental work.

That includes the developmental prototypes and the operational aircraft that is currently in production for the Chinese military.

"So I wish success to the helicopter," Mikheev says.

Mikheev would not comment on the WZ-10's performance. "That is a question for the Chinese," he says. "I know what I have done."

source : Asian Defence
 

The dragon gets a bear hug

Russia is resuming the supply of advanced weapon platforms to China in a move that may have implications for India.





At the end of last year, Russia concluded a framework agreement with China for the sale of four Amur-1650 diesel submarines. In January it signed another intergovernmental agreement for the supply of Russia’s latest Su-35 long-range fighter planes.

If the deals go through, it will be for the first time in a decade that Russia has delivered offensive weapons to China.

It will also mark the first time that Russia has supplied China with more powerful weapon platforms compared with Russian-built systems India has in its arsenals. In the past, the opposite was the rule.
For example, the Su-30MKK jet fighters Russia sold to China were no match for the Su-30MKIs supplied to India at about the same time. The Chinese planes had an inferior radar and without the thrust vectoring engines the Indian version had.

This time the situation looks reversed. The Amur-1650 submarine is far more silent and powerful than the Kilo-class submarines the Indian Navy has in its inventory. India’s Su-30MKI will be no match for China’s Su-35 which is powered by a higher thrust engine and boasts a more sophisticated radar, avionics and weapons, according to a leading Russian military expert, Konstantin Makienko.

China’s acquisition of the Su-35 will also question the wisdom of India’s plan to buy the French Rafale, the expert said.

“The sale of Su-35s to China will shoot down the value of the Rafale for India,” Mr. Makienko, who is deputy head of Russia’s top defence think tank, Centre for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies, told The Hindu.

“The Rafale will stand no chance against China’s Su-35,” the expert explained. “The Su-35’s Irbis radar has more than twice the detection range of the Rafale’s Thales RBE2, and will lock onto its target well before the Russian plane becomes visible for a retaliatory strike. The 117S engines of the Su-35 are also far more powerful than the Rafale’s Snecma M88.”

The Russian Air Force is just beginning to take delivery of the new aircraft and China may become the first country to import it. The relatively small number of Su-35s China plans to buy, 24, should not deceive anyone, Mr. Makienko said. China followed the same buying pattern for the Su-27, initially ordering 24 planes and ending up with more than 200 Su-27s and its licence-built version, the J-11.

The supply to China of more advanced weapon platforms than those available to India appears to contradict some basic geopolitical realities. India remains Russia’s most trusted partner whose defence requirements have never been refused. By contrast, Russia has always been apprehensive of the Chinese dragon and suspicious of its intentions towards resource-rich and population-poor Siberia.

Calls for restraint
There is consensus in the Russian strategic community that Moscow should exercise maximum restraint in providing China with advanced military technologies. Experts were shocked to find out that Chinese engineers had mastered the production of clones of most weapon systems cash-strapped Russia supplied to China in the 1990s and early 2000s.

Russian arms sales to China plummeted in recent years as China switched to domestic production, while Moscow became more cautious in offering Beijing cutting-edge technologies. Not only did China illegally copy Russian weapon systems, but it also began to export those undercutting Russian sales of higher-priced original platforms.

Some experts even called for a complete halt to arms sales to China, arguing that demographic pressures and a growing need of resources may one day push China to turn Russian weapons against Russia.

“We should stop selling them the rope to hang us with,” warned Alexander Khramchikhin of the Institute for Political and Military Analysis.

However, the risks of selling advanced weapons to China took a back seat in Moscow’s calculations after Vladimir Putin returned to the Kremlin for a third term a year ago. Last year, Russia’s state arms exporter, Rosoboronexport, signed contracts with China worth $2.1-billion, the company’s head Anatoly Isaikin said recently. The renewal of sophisticated weapon supplies to China should be seen in the context of geopolitical games in the China-U.S.-Russia triangle.

“The balance of power between America and China will to a large extend depend on whether and on which side Russia will play,” said Fyodor Lukyanov, foreign policy analyst.

Russia and China are revitalising defence ties at a time when their relations with the U.S. have run into rough waters. Moscow is deeply disappointed with Mr. Obama’s policy of “reset,” which is seen in Moscow as a U.S. instrument of winning unilateral concessions from Russia, while Beijing views Mr. Obama’s strategic redeployment in the Asia-Pacific region as aimed at containing China.

Profit motives
Russian defence sales to China are also driven by profit motives as arms manufacturers seek to compensate for the recent loss of several lucrative contracts in India, where they face growing competition from the U.S., Europe and Israel. Also, Moscow seems to be less concerned today about the so-called “reverse engineering” of Russian weapons in China as the ability of the Chinese industry to copy critical technologies appears to have been overrated.

“China’s programme of developing the J-11B family of aircraft based on the Su-27 platform has run into problems,” said Vasily Kashin, expert on China. “China’s aircraft engines, which are essentially modified version of Russian engines, are way too inferior to the originals and China continues to depend on the supply of Russian engines.”

In the past three-four years, China has bought over 1,000 aircraft engines from Russia and is expected to place more orders in coming years.

“When and if China succeeds in copying Russia’s new weapon platforms the Russian industry will hopefully move ahead with new technologies,” Mr. Kashin said.

India can also easily offset the advantage that new Russian arms supplies may give China, experts said.
“To retain its edge in military aviation, India needs to speed up the development of a 5th-generation fighter plane with Russia and go for in-depth upgrade of its fleet of Su-30MKI fighters,” Mr. Makienko said.

Trade differences
However, the resumption of massive Russian arms supplies to China could still be a cause for concern in India. Closer defence ties between Moscow and Beijing are an offshoot of strong dynamics of their overall relations. China is Russia’s top commercial partner, with bilateral trade expected to touch $90 billion this year and soar to $200 billion by 2020. Mr. Putin has described China’s rise as “a chance to catch the Chinese wind in the sails of our economy.”

This contrasts with sluggish trade between India and Russia, which stood at $11 billion last year; even the target of $20 billion the two governments set for 2015 falls short on ambition. India risks being eclipsed by China on the Russian radar screens. As Russia’s top business daily Kommersant noted recently, even today, Russian officials from top to bottom tend to look at India with “drowsy apathy,” while Mr. Putin’s visit to India last year was long on “meaningless protocol” and short on time and substance.
 

Russia to assist Vietnam in naval development

Speaking at a press conference after a talk with Vietnamese Defense Minister General Phung Quang Thanh, visiting Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu this morning said Russia would help Vietnam in submarine building and crew training.




Vietnamese Defense Minister General Phung Quang Thanh (R) receives Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu in Hanoi - Photo: VietNamNet

“Within this year, the two countries’ common effort is to open a new page in the history of development of Vietnam’s navy,” Shoigu, who started his visit to Vietnam on March 4, said.

Russia will help Vietnam train crews and build new naval ships. This is an important part in the cooperation between the naval forces of the two countries, Shoigu said.

He also expressed his thanks for Vietnam’s invitation of Russian naval veterans who once helped Vietnam in the past to visit Vietnam for relaxation and medical treatment.

He said he hoped that a tourist resort intended for Russian soldiers will be set up in Vietnam soon.

Regarding the Vietnamese side’s suggestion to establish an annual defense dialogue mechanism between the two countries, Shoigu said he totally supported the suggestion and hoped that such a mechanism could be operational within this year.

For his part, General Thanh said that the visit to Vietnam by the Russian Defense Minister manifested the respect for the bilateral friendship cooperation in defense between the two countries.

"Our talk took place in the spirit of friendship, openness, reliability and mutual understanding," Thanh said.

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu (L) and his Vietnamese counterpart General Phung Quang Thanh at the press conference held after their talk on March 5 (Photo: VnExpress)
“We have discussed cooperation in military techniques. Vietnam will continue purchasing weapons from Russia and Vietnam’s military units will cooperate with Russian counterparts for mutual benefits,” Thanh said.

Regarding the Cam Ranh Port, Thanh told the press that the port, a strategic seaport, had been planned into three areas – one for military use, another for technical logistics services and the other for civil purposes.

Vietnam allows naval ships from all countries, not only Russia, to arrive at the port for logistics and repair services, Thanh said.

Before the talk, Shoigu laid a wreath at the Monument to Heroes and Martyrs and paid tribute to President Ho Chi Minh at his mausoleum in Hanoi.

Shoygu’s visit to Vietnam was made at General Thanh’s invitation and is his first working visit to the country since he took up the ministerial position last November.

Read more : Touitre News
 

US troops testing jungle skills during Cobra Gold exercise

Sgt. Robert Juarez opens wide for a few drops of cobra blood after the snake's head has been severed. Juarez and other soldiers from Company B, 2nd Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment, based in South Korea, drank the blood as part of a ritual common among Thai soldiers. Soldiers from both countries recently trained during the Cobra Gold exercise in Thailand. 
LINDSEY ELDER/U.S. ARMY






PHITSANULOK, Thailand — The sweltering sun burned directly overhead as U.S. Army Pacific Command Sgt. Maj. Frank Leota pointed to the thicket of trees and vines behind him during one of the last days of this month’s Cobra Gold exercise.

“Look at the backyard we’re in. It’s all jungle,” Leota told about 20 sweat-drenched soldiers who’d just completed an exercise that involved creeping and crawling through the thick terrain. “The Pacific. It’s all jungle.”

Leota was drawing the distinction between the kind of war U.S. troops have been fighting for a decade — mostly in urban and semi-desert terrain — and how vastly different war would be fought in the jungle.

“These field crafts, you have to master them,” said the 33-year Army veteran.

Training U.S. soldiers and Marines in the Thai jungle has long been a staple activity of the venerable Cobra Gold exercise, held for the 32nd time. But its focus on Asia has never been timelier.

For more than a year the Pentagon has been talking up its pivot to the Pacific, away from Afghanistan as the war ends and away from Europe as assets are shifted east. And while conflicts in the Pacific have in the past been dominated by naval engagements, virtually any land battle below the Tropic of Cancer would be waged in jungle.

Four nations that fully participate in Cobra Gold — Thailand, Singapore, Indonesia and Malaysia — are within that area. The other three fully participating countries, the U.S., Japan, and South Korea, are a major Pacific alliance.

Other Asian nations were invited to observe. For the first time, Myanmar — also known as Burma and for many years an international pariah because of its oppressive ruling junta — sent two officers to observe a staff planning exercise and visit a school being built by troops as part of the humanitarian segment of Cobra Gold.

U.S. Embassy spokeswoman Kristin Kneedler told Voice of America that Myanmar’s attendance was part of “whole government approach” of reform in the country. She said that included “engaging the Burmese military as an important stakeholder in and a potential contributor to the reform processes.”

Among the many U.S. troops participating were dozens of soldiers from Company B, 2nd Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment, 1st Armored Brigade Combat Team, 2nd Infantry Division, based in South Korea.

With deployment experience over the past decade, the soldiers were teamed up with their Thai counterparts to share knowledge and techniques, sometimes one-on-one.

“Based on our experiences in Iraq and Afghanistan, we’re extremely proficient at urban operations, and we’ve done a significant amount of training on short-range marksmanship,” said Lt. Col. Shawn Creamer, battalion commander. “That’s where — old guys like me, we used to call it reflexive fire — you’re basically standing there, a target pops up, and it’s almost instinctive shooting. Muscle memory. That’s the training we’re providing to the Royal Thai Army soldiers of 5th Battalion.”

Creamer’s soldiers, on the other hand, received training in jungle patrol and survival.

“I ate a live scorpion,” Sgt. Brent Smith said matter-of-factly. “I just took a bite off it. It’s a survival technique. It can be cooked or eaten raw. It’s kind of chewy, weird. The shell is hard and crunchy but the inside is kind of like mush. We just passed it around and took a bite of it.”

They also ate a variety of beetles, grub worms and native plants.

Anything tasty? “Not really,” Smith said.

Thai Sgt. Thiti Noikoon said through an interpreter that he could easily survive for 12 days in the jungle carrying only uncooked sticky rice for food.

Second Lt. Robert Greeson was impressed by the self-sufficiency of Thai soldiers.

“Surviving off the land is like a way of life,” he said. “Literally, every day they go out to the pond with nets and catch their lunch. The base is like its own farm. It’s self-sustaining. They have plants, livestock, grow rice. And they all know how to forage in the jungle.

“I don’t think I could survive a month [in the jungle]. But I mean, I know more now than I did before I got here, that’s for sure.”

The Thais also taught the U.S. soldiers how to remove the fangs of constricting snakes from their bodies if bitten.

“A constrictor is designed with a mouthful of teeth to grab, grip and hold, so that way he can wrap around and squeeze his prey until it suffocates,” said Sgt. Robert Juarez. “The venomous snakes do a quick bite and wait for the venom to take effect.” The fangs are curved like a fishhook, so there’s an art to removing them without tearing away a hunk of flesh.

Many of the soldiers held out an arm as a Thai soldier unleashed an agitated constrictor on them.

“That’s the snake bite right there,” said Pvt. Colby Rau after rolling up the sleeve on his forearm, revealing four puncture wounds from a few days earlier.

“I kind of wondered how it would feel,” he said. “If I’m walking through the jungle, I’m prepared for it now. If I see that snake, hey, at least it won’t make me freak out,” adding that “it wasn’t as bad as I thought it would be.”

The soldiers also shared in a Thai ritual of drinking blood from the beheaded body of a cobra. The custom also included a “cobra cocktail” of blood and rum.

“They said that cobra blood was a Thai tradition that would give you strength and manliness,” Rau said.

Asked if he felt the cobra drink delivered as advertised, Juarez smiled and said, “I felt empowered by the people around me. The Thais were very supportive of it and very motivated by us doing it, so that’s what was empowering.”

A few days later the soldiers were paired with Thais for a lesson in creeping silently through the jungle. Thai soldiers travel light, carrying far less equipment than their American counterparts.

“You have to learn to live in this,” Leota told the gathered group of soldiers. “One thing you’ll learn is that you cannot fight the jungle and fight the enemy at the same time. You’re going to lose. So you have to learn how to survive in this environment in order to fight in it.”

Leota said that after joining the Army in 1980, he spent his formative years in Panama where there was jungle so dense “you’d move for three hours and only move a half-mile.

“I was fortunate,” he said. “I had squad leaders and platoon sergeants who were Vietnam vets, who knew how to survive in the jungle.”

He said it was obvious that soldiers are no longer outfitted appropriately for a jungle setting. “What you see over there is right,” he said, pointing to several Thai soldiers who carried virtually nothing but two canteens, a small pouch, a rope and a weapon.

He said the U.S. Army had recently learned some hard lessons at an exercise in Singapore, in which “we didn’t move 700 meters and we had 11 heat casualties.”

Operations Sgt. Maj. William Linares admonished the same group of soldiers to begin preparing for an unknown future.

“Before 9/11, how many of us thought we’d be in Iraq or Afghanistan? I didn’t. I knew there were things going on over there, but I didn’t think about it. And did any of you think you were going to be there that long?”

Who’s to say that they might not be deployed to a Southeast Asian jungle? he asked.

Leota recalled a squad leader from his Panama years — a Vietnam War vet — who would sit out in the middle of the jungle and require his soldiers to take turns trying to sneak up behind him without being heard.

“That’s the kind of stuff we learned, and we’re going to get back to that,” he said. “It’s going to take a couple years. You may not master it, but you can get better at it.

“When the time comes and we’ve got to come out here in somebody’s backyard in a jungle environment, we’ll already have folks with some sort of experience.”

source : Stripes
 

Airstrikes just first of our firepower options

IT'S amazing what a round of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare can do -- that a cherubic, bespectacled couch potato, who is as athletic as a slab of tofu with zero military background, can form an opinion of how a military campaign should be waged.

Even before the dust cloud from the airstrikes on the Sulu terrorist positions in Kampung Tanduo in Lahad Datu had settled, earth-bound pseudo-"Mavericks" and armchair generals were already taking to the blogs and social media to give their take on how the air and ground offensive should have been carried out.

Some had claimed that the airstrikes by the three Royal Malaysian Air Force Boeing F/A-18D Hornets and five British Aerospace Hawk 208s that were launched off from Labuan had been completely ineffective and had failed to neutralise the enemy.

One even said: "The US air campaigns shows (sic) that effective aerial bombardment requires hundreds if not thousands of ordnance drop (sic) over several days", and suggested that for the airstrikes to work, a sustained bombing campaign along the lines of the Tora Bora throwdown in December, 2001 (five days) and the two-month bombing campaign in Kosovo in 1999, should have been implemented.

There were also those who said that the pilots had completely missed the target, the absence of a body count being the justification for their claims.

An online news portal reported that Abraham Idjirani, the spokesman for the terror group, had said that the bombs dropped by the air force had not hit their positions but had, instead, fallen on security forces that had massed up for the assault.

A late night chat over teh tarik and roti tampal with "Taco", a retired Hornet driver with more than 2,000 hours logged on the type, and his former backseater "Hanus" shed some light on the operational thinking that went into the planning and execution of the air offensive segment of Ops Daulat.

"The first thing you have to realise is, the air force's mission here was not to take out the enemy. They were tasked with softening up the target for the ground troops.

"Because the terrorists are scattered in the area of operations, there's no way the ground commanders can be certain that an airstrike would get every single one of them.

"That's why they opted for a layered offensive. The airstrike was just one element. We still needed to put boots on the ground and clear the area door-to-door, one house at a time."

The aerial bombardment was followed by a mortar barrage and suppressive fire from heavy machine guns before the ground forces were sent in.

When parallels between Tora Bora, Kosovo and Lahad Datu were brought up, "Hanus" put things in perspective.

"Bro, Tora Bora and Kosovo are two completely different scenarios. "Tora Bora is huge, so is Kosovo. It took five days of constant pounding in Tora Bora because of the extensive network of tunnels bored miles into the mountain.

"Even thermobaric bombs and 2,000 pounders couldn't do the job as the tunnels were dug deep inside the mountain.

"Plus, there was no specific intel on the exact location of Osama Bin Laden, and the Taliban numbered in the thousands. Nato took two months to bring Kosovo to its knees because of the huge tasking and targeting folders that needed to be sorted out."

"This (Kampung Tanduo) was a precision strike. Every single target the pilots were given was from three weeks of observation and intelligence-gathering.

"We didn't have to carpet bomb Kampung Tanduo because the Hornets' loadout was (GBU-12 Paveway II) laser guided bombs. These are precision-guided munitions; this was a surgical strike. You 'lase' the target with the (AN/AAS-38 Nitehawk) laser target designator and you can't miss," "Taco" adds.

The idea of carpet bombing, a concept borne on the back of the London blitz of the 1940s by Air Chief Marshal Sir Arthur 'Bomber' Harris against German cities and industrial centres, is no longer socially palatable, more so if the area being hit is your own backyard. Politically, it's suicide.

"Carpet bombing is when you want to level an entire town full of enemy combatants. Not a good idea when you're doing it on your own territory and when the risk of collateral damage is high.

"Our guys established a very tight FEBA (forward edge of battle area) because of the proximity of the villages to the target. They took into consideration the lives and property of fellow Malaysians.

"We knew exactly where the terrorists were located from various sources; Humint (human intelligence, from people on the ground), Sigint (signals intelligence) and Comint (intercepted communications, decrypted communique) and other still-classified sources," says Taco.

"This is a limited, low-intensity conflict which requires precision strike capability. The air force's objective for this mission was to soften the targets for the ground forces, nothing more.

"Also, it's not how many bombs you drop, it's how you use them. If the intel is solid and 10 bombs can do the job, why would you want to expend more munitions?"

How do you explain the absence of a body count resulting from the airstrike, then?

"Dude, do you know what a 500lb bomb can do to a human body? If it's an airburst, the lethality radius is expanded. You vapourise. That's it. If that doesn't kill you, the overpressure will.

"The concussion will rip you apart, but not before turning your internal organs to mush. Fusing plays a major part in the kill radius of the bomb."

We should never be led to believe that this crisis will be over in a few days and that one airstrike will get rid of the problem. More work lies ahead for the ground troops and any thoughts that a sustained bombing campaign alone will solve this problem is downright irresponsible and naive.

ON THE OFFENSIVE: The aerial bombardment of Sulu terrorists in Kampung Tanduo merely marks the start of the blitz on our enemies
Read more : New Straits Times
 

LESSONS FOR S'PORE: M'sian Armed Forces versus Sulu gunmen in Sabah

Written by David Boey
LESSONS FOR S'PORE: M'sian Armed Forces versus Sulu gunmen in Sabah
SINGAPORE - A week ago, Malaysia's defence information officers were busy ramping up publicity for the Malaysian Army's 80th Anniversary celebrations - a happy occasion that culminated in a massive show of force by Tentera Darat Malaysia (Malaysian Army) in Port Dickson.

After a weekend on duty, their pace of work increased dramatically with real operations in the East Malaysian state of Sabah. Ongoing operations by Malaysian security forces against Filipino gunmen in Lahad Datu, Sabah, mean that it will be sometime yet before information officers from Cawangan Perhubungan Awam (Public Relations Department) at Kementerian Pertahanan (Kementah, the Malaysian Ministry of Defence) can enjoy a restful weekend.

The exposure to real operations in Sabah will reward Kementah's information officers with firsthand experience managing hearts and minds operations during an unfolding operation that has international dimensions.

Add in the timing of the operation, which was triggered during the run-up to the Malaysian General Elections, and the information officers entrusted to handle media operations will get a chance to learn invaluable lessons in calibrating domestic political considerations during an unfolding operation other than war (OOTW).

While it is early days yet before defence observers can compile a credible blow by blow account of the assault, here are some preliminary thoughts on the situation:

1. Malaysia's mainstream broadcast media, RTM, worked commendably fast in producing the clip with rousing martial music and TV footage aired at the end of Tuesday night's news bulletin that cavassed support for Malaysia's Fallen Heroes.

This is the type of psychological defence response that the Malaysians are good at, having picked up valuable lessons from the British during the Emergency years.

2. The casual attitude to personal protection equipment by Malaysian soldiers and General Operations Force field police has been noted by defence observers.

During the three-week long standoff against a force which claims has 200 gunmen and even after blood was shed, Malaysians deployed for security duty do not seem to care much for their personal protection.

* Body armour is rarely seen. When worn by some officers, the body armour appears to be of the soft body armour type which is not designed to withstand full metal jacket projectiles discharged from firearms or mortar rounds.

* Headgear in the form of ballistic helmets is almost never worn. And let's not even go into protective eyewear like goggles.

This apparently cavalier attitude during live operations is baffling when measured against mountains of defence science literature which underline how lives can have been saved from ballistic protection.

If the officers are content to deploy for operations unaware of the life-saving potential of ballistic protection, then this indicates a failure of the curriculum in Malaysia's military education system.

If the officers are aware but sent their men into action ill-equipped, then the After Action Review (AAR) should perhaps look at how to address the shortfall in such equipment.

Medical reports on the Malaysian security forces killed in action should indicate the cause of death, whether by penetrations from firearm projectiles (if so, the estimated calibre), shrapnel or non-penetrating trauma caused by blast damage.

A frank report would reveal the possible root causes of casualties during the Sabah operation and could suggest the type of protection needed to reduce casualties during the next operation.

3. Concomitant with the above observation is the poor quality of firearms used by the Police General Operations Force.

Their M-16 5.56mm rifles are aimed using iron sights. There appears to be no option for optical sights (for example, a Picatinny rail) that can improve marksmanship or, more importantly, allow Malaysian police officers a rudimentary night-fighting capability.

4. Even after a deadly ambush, it is noteworthy that armoured vehicles appear to be in short supply in Sabah. Vehicle patrols by the police there continue to be mounted in unarmoured Land Rovers and trucks. Again, this begs the question what happened to lessons learned during the Emergency?

5. The tit-for-tat cyber attacks, said to have been the work of computer hackers from Manila and Kuala Lumpur, are a sign of things to come during a Period of Tension (POT) or OOTW (which is what the Sabah operation has evolved into).

Singapore must therefore prepare itself for such a virtual world onslaught as part of its business continuity plan. It should perhaps also study options to pay back with interests anyone who opens an account with Singapore using cyber attacks.

6. At a more basic level of security preparedness, it would be ill-advised for the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Defence and Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) to display the level of tolerance shown by the Malaysians during this episode.

A three-week standoff against armed intruders said to have conducted active operations on home ground and shed blood is a trigger point Singapore's government should never de-sensitise itself to.

Our circuit breaker must be designed to trip much faster so that a swift and decisive response can be unleashed.

The writer, a former defence correspondent for the Straits Times, maintains Senang Diri , a blog about Singapore defence matters ( http://kementah.blogspot.sg/).

-AsiaOne
 

Brazil starts programme to build nuclear submarine in decade

BRASILIA, March 1 — Brazil took a major step today towards joining the small club of nations that have nuclear-powered submarines with the opening of a naval shipyard installation that will build French-designed submarines.

A Scorpene-class diesel submarine at the shipyard in Cherbourg, France, on Oct. 21, 2003. — AFP picPresident Dilma Rousseff inaugurated the factory that will make metal hull structures for four conventional diesel-electric Scorpene attack submarines and eventually a fifth submarine powered by a nuclear reactor developed entirely by Brazil.

The submarines will be made by French shipbuilder DCNS in a joint venture with Brazil’s Odebrecht at the Brazilian Navy base on Sepetiba bay south of Rio de Janeiro.


The 7.8 billion reais (RM12.23 billion) programme will turn out the first conventional submarine in 2015 and the nuclear-powered submarine will be commissioned in 2023 and enter operation in 2025, the Brazilian Navy said in a statement.

The submarines are a key part of Brazil’s effort to build a modern navy that can defend its oil and trade interests in the South Atlantic, a region long dominated by the British and US navies. It is also a revival of nuclear development by the Brazilian military that was halted in 1990 with the end of the country’s nuclear bomb programme.

If successful, Brazil will join the United States, Russia, Britain, France and China - the five members of the permanent UN Security Council, a club Brazil aspires to join — as a country with a home-grown nuclear submarine capability.

The Indian Navy has a nuclear-powered attack submarine, the INS Chakra, that was leased from Russia, and India is building a nuclear submarine with its own technology that is expected to be in service by 2015.

The Brazilian Navy statement stressed that the nuclear propulsion system will be built with entirely home-grown technology that was not transferred by France.

“Brazil needs to modernise its national defences because we have not invested in this for years,” said Congressman Leonardo Gadelha, of the Social Christian Party, a member of the lower chamber’s International Relations and Defence Committee.

“Brazil has one of the longest coastlines in the world and we need submarines to patrol and defend this coast,” he said.

The Brazilian-French submarine programme was agreed to in 2008 by Presidents Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Nicolas Sarkozy and is Brazil’s most costly defence project.

The air force of Latin America’s largest nation is also seeking to renew its fleet with the purchase of 36 fighter jets, a coveted defence contract worth US$4 billion (RM12 billion) initially. Boeing Co., France’s Dassault Aviation SA and Sweden’s Saab are in the running for the deal.

Brazil has insisted on the maximum transfer of technology in such military contracts to build up its emerging private defence industry that has become a major arms exporter.

On Wednesday, the defence unit of Brazilian planemaker Embraer SA won its first-ever US military contract for the sale of 20 Super Tucano light attack planes for use in counterinsurgency in Afghanistan. — Reuters

 

ThalesRaytheonSystems Completes Command and Control System for Malaysian Ministry of Defence

FULLERTON, Calif., (Feb. 20, 2013) – ThalesRaytheonSystems today announced full system acceptance has been finalized with the Royal Malaysian Air Force for the Malaysian Air Defense Ground Environment Sector Operations Center III (MADGE) Program. ThalesRaytheonSystems provided the Malaysian Ministry of Defence an enhanced national command and control system.


“The C2 system we’ve executed in Malaysia represents technological integration at its best,” said Kim Kerry, CEO of U.S. Operations for ThalesRaytheonSystems. “We worked with our Malaysian customers to integrate their legacy system and have augmented it with proven technologies, such as the Sentry® command and control system and the Ground Master 400 (GM 400) radar. The result is a system that reliably and effectively meets their requirements.”

The MADGE system operates in real-time and features multi-radar tracking and a flexible human-machine interface. The GM 400 radar will provide additional long-range surveillance capabilities for the Royal Malaysian Air Force.

ThalesRaytheonSystems has more installed command and control systems operating around the world than any other organization. The Sentry command and control system is a proven, comprehensive, real-time system that powers national air sovereignty systems around the world, including the NORAD Battle Control System. The company is also a world leader in battlefield and weapon-locating radar systems. The company’s radar capabilities span short-, medium-, and long-range systems. The ground-based radars are capable of detecting both conventional and unconventional threats for homeland and tactical air defense, counter-battery, and weapons system coordination.

About ThalesRaytheonSystems
ThalesRaytheonSystems is an international company specializing in air defense systems, command and control systems, 3D air defense radars, and battlefield and weapon locating radars. Since its founding in 2001, ThalesRaytheonSystems has become one of the defense industry’s most successful transatlantic joint ventures. The company employs 1,600 people and is equally owned by Raytheon and Thales.

 
 
Support : Creating Website | Johny Template | Mas Template
Copyright © 2011. MyDefTech - All Rights Reserved
Template Created by Creating Website Published by Mas Template
Proudly powered by Blogger